Lake v. City of Phoenix

218 P.3d 1004, 222 Ariz. 547 (2009) · Supreme Court of Arizona · October 29, 2009 · No. CV-09-0036-PR

Summary

The Supreme Court of Arizona held that when a public entity maintains a public record in electronic format, the electronic version, including embedded metadata, is subject to disclosure under Arizona's public records law. The court also held that a superior court generally may not decline jurisdiction over a properly filed special action seeking access to public records. The judgment was vacated in part and remanded.

Holdings

  1. When a public entity maintains a public record in electronic format, the electronic version of the record, including embedded metadata, is subject to disclosure under Arizona's public-records law.
  2. When a person properly invokes the special-action procedure under A.R.S. § 39-121.02(A) to challenge denial of access to public records, the superior court lacks discretion to deny jurisdiction and must decide the case on its merits.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether an electronic version of a public record, including embedded metadata, is subject to disclosure under Arizona's public-records law.
  2. Whether the superior court had discretion to deny jurisdiction and relief on a special action brought under A.R.S. § 39-121.02 to challenge denial of access to public records.

Disposition

vacated

Cases Cited (7)

  • Mathews v. Pyle, 75 Ariz. 76, 251 P.2d 893 (1952)(followed in part)
  • Lake v. City of Phoenix, 220 Ariz. 472, 207 P.3d 725 (App. 2009)(reversed in part and vacated in relevant part)
  • Griffis v. Pinal County, 215 Ariz. 1, 156 P.3d 418 (2007)(followed)
  • Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Keegan, 201 Ariz. 344, 35 P.3d 105 (App. 2001)(followed)
  • Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. Rogers, 168 Ariz. 531, 815 P.2d 900 (1991)(followed)
  • Carlson v. Pima County, 141 Ariz. 487, 687 P.2d 1242 (1984)(followed)
  • Williams v. Sprint/United Management Co., 230 F.R.D. 640 (D. Kan. 2005)(persuasive analogy)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…