Summary
The Supreme Court of Arkansas affirmed J.M. Peterson's capital-murder conviction and sentence of life imprisonment without parole. The court held that testimony concerning the victim's statements about an earlier assault and kidnapping was properly admitted under the excited-utterance exception to the hearsay rule.
Holdings
- The statements qualified as excited utterances because they related to a startling event and were made while Lisa Peterson remained under the stress of excitement caused by that event.
- The trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting Wilfong's testimony under Rule 803(2).
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting Gena Wilfong's testimony about statements Lisa Peterson made concerning the alleged battery, kidnapping, and threats under the excited-utterance exception to the hearsay rule.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- Flores v. State, 348 Ark. 28, 69 S.W.3d 864 (2002)(followed)
- Fudge v. State, 341 Ark. 759, 20 S.W.3d 315 (2000)(followed)
- Moore v. State, 317 Ark. 630, 882 S.W.2d 667 (1994)(followed)
- United States v. Iron Shell, 633 F.2d 77 (8th Cir. 1980)(followed)
- Killcrease v. State, 310 Ark. 392, 836 S.W.2d 380 (1992)(followed)
- Cole v. State, 307 Ark. 41, 818 S.W.2d 573 (1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…