Summary
The Supreme Court of Arkansas held, for the first time in the state, that the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial encompasses a right to speedy sentencing. Applying the Barker v. Wingo factors, the court concluded that the nearly six-year delay between the defendant's guilty plea and sentencing violated that right. The court vacated the sentence and ordered Jolly released from custody.
Holdings
- The Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial encompasses a criminal defendant's right to speedy sentencing.
- The State's nearly six-year delay in sentencing Jolly violated his Sixth Amendment right to speedy sentencing.
- The proper remedy for denial of the right to speedy sentencing is to vacate the sentence and release the defendant from custody.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial encompasses a right to speedy sentencing after a defendant has pleaded guilty.
- Whether the nearly six-year delay between Jolly's guilty plea and sentencing violated that right under the Barker v. Wingo factors.
- What remedy is appropriate for an unconstitutional delay in sentencing.
Disposition
vacated
Cases Cited (24)
- Smith v. Hooey, 393 U.S. 374 (1969)(followed)
- United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 (1966)(citing)
- Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972)(followed)
- Gardner v. State, 252 Ark. 828, 481 S.W.2d 342 (1972)(followed)
- Pollard v. United States, 352 U.S. 354 (1957)(distinguished)
- United States v. Gibson, 353 F.3d 21 (D.C. Cir. 2003)(followed)
- United States v. Martinez, 837 F.2d 861 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Burkett v. Cunningham, 826 F.2d 1208 (3d Cir. 1987)(followed)
- Perez v. Sullivan, 793 F.2d 249 (10th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- United States v. Campisi, 583 F.2d 692 (3d Cir. 1978)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 24.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…