Summary
The Supreme Court of Arkansas granted a final thirty-day extension for completion of the appellate record in Keith Alan Petras's criminal appeal. The court found that counsel satisfied the procedural requirements for an extension but expressed concern about recurring delays by the court reporter and referred the matter to the State Board of Court Reporter Examiners. Justice Glaze dissented, arguing that the extension request did not adequately explain the delay and that a hearing should be held.
Holdings
- The court granted a writ of certiorari as a final extension and directed the court reporter to complete the appellate record within thirty days.
- The court referred the matter to the State Board of Court Reporter Examiners for appropriate review.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Supreme Court of Arkansas should grant a writ of certiorari and allow additional time to complete the appellate record when the appellant complied with the procedural requirements for the initial extension but the court reporter failed to complete the record within the seven-month period.
- Whether the matter should be referred to the State Board of Court Reporter Examiners because of recurring delays by the court reporter.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (8)
- Coggins v. Coggins, 353 Ark. 431, 108 S.W.3d 588 (2003)(followed)
- Holland v. State, 358 Ark. 366, 190 S.W.3d 904 (2004) (per curiam)(followed)
- Franklin v. State, 317 Ark. 42, 875 S.W.2d 836 (1994) (per curiam)(followed)
- Warren Camp v. State of Arkansas, CR04-1368(cited)
- Wayne Bowker v. State of Arkansas, CR04-817(cited)
- Sharon White v. Randy Mattingly, CA04-90(cited)
- Francisco Bartes Palma v. State of Arkansas, CACR04-350(cited)
- Michael L. Venn v. State of Arkansas, CACR04-1315(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…