Summary
The Supreme Court of Arkansas held that Nelson demonstrated good cause under Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i) for extending the time to serve his medical-malpractice complaint. Because the summons and complaint had been delivered to the county sheriff before the 120-day deadline but service had not yet been completed, the court reversed the dismissal with prejudice and remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- A motion for an extension of time to complete service satisfies Rule 4(i)'s contemporaneous good-cause requirement when it states that the summons and complaint were delivered to the sheriff before the deadline but the sheriff had been unable to complete service.
- The dismissal with prejudice was improper because Nelson's motion established good cause under Rule 4(i), making the extension valid.
Questions Presented
- Whether Nelson's motion for an extension of time to serve the summons and complaint satisfied the good-cause requirement of Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i).
- Whether the circuit court erred by dismissing the medical-malpractice complaint with prejudice after determining that the extension order was invalid.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (2)
- Henyan v. Peek, 359 Ark. 486, 199 S.W.3d 51 (2004)(distinguished)
- King v. Carney, 341 Ark. 955, 20 S.W.3d 341 (2000)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…