Dollarway Patrons for Better Schools v. Dollarway School District, 374 Ark. 92

286 S.W.3d 123 (2008) · Supreme Court of Arkansas · June 26, 2008 · No. No. 08-33

Summary

The Supreme Court of Arkansas held that the plaintiffs attempted to state a claim for illegal exaction rather than an untimely election contest. The court reversed the dismissal under Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and remanded for consideration of whether the complaint stated a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), including whether misrepresentations by the school district could render the tax election void. The court did not decide the plaintiffs’ fiduciary-duty, constructive-fraud, or unclean-hands arguments.

Holdings

  1. The complaint was not an election contest because DPBS did not challenge the vote count, seek a recount, or seek to replace a certified winner; instead, it alleged that there was no authority to hold the election at all.
  2. DPBS attempted to plead a cause of action in illegal exaction, and the circuit court erred in dismissing the complaint under Rule 12(b)(1) as an untimely election contest.
  3. The issue was unresolved on appeal; the case was remanded for the circuit court to decide whether Arkansas law should be extended beyond the categories recognized in City of Rector and, if so, whether the alleged conduct stated a claim to void the election and make the tax illegal.
  4. The court declined to decide those theories because they were not decided by the circuit court and would not be addressed for the first time on appeal.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the complaint was an election contest subject to the twenty-day limitation and procedures in Ark. Code Ann. § 6-14-116.
  2. Whether the complaint attempted to state an illegal-exaction claim based on an allegation that the election was illegally held and therefore a nullity.
  3. Whether the law governing voiding elections should be extended to representations made by a taxing authority concerning the tax increase it sought.
  4. Whether the appellate court should decide claims based on breach of fiduciary duty, constructive fraud, or unclean hands when those issues were not decided below.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (18)

  • Bright v. Zega, 358 Ark. 82, 186 S.W.3d 201 (2004)(followed)
  • R.K. Enters., LLC v. Pro-Comp Mgmt., Inc., 372 Ark. 199, 272 S.W.3d 85 (2008)(followed)
  • Douglas v. Williams, 240 Ark. 933, 405 S.W.2d 259 (1966)(followed)
  • Adams v. Dixie Sch. Dist. No. 7, 264 Ark. 178, 570 S.W.2d 603 (1978)(followed)
  • King v. Davis, 324 Ark. 253, 920 S.W.2d 488 (1996)(followed)
  • Phillips v. Earngey, 321 Ark. 476, 902 S.W.2d 782 (1995)(followed)
  • Rubens v. Hodges, 310 Ark. 451, 837 S.W.2d 465 (1992)(followed)
  • Files v. Hill, 268 Ark. 106, 594 S.W.2d 836 (1980)(followed)
  • Spires v. Election Comm'n of Union County, 302 Ark. 407, 790 S.W.2d 167 (1990)(followed)
  • Binns v. Heck, 322 Ark. 277, 908 S.W.2d 328 (1995)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 18.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…