Summary
The Supreme Court of Arkansas denied Laura Allen's petition for a writ of prohibition seeking to prevent the Ninth Division of the Pulaski County Circuit Court from exercising jurisdiction over an action concerning enforcement of a family settlement agreement. The court held that prohibition was unavailable because the Ninth Division had already acted, and treated the petition as one for certiorari. It concluded that the jurisdictional-priority rule did not clearly establish a plain, manifest, clear, and gross abuse of discretion by the Ninth Division.
Holdings
- A writ of prohibition does not lie to prevent action that the lower court has already taken.
- The common-law jurisdictional-priority rule did not prevent the Ninth Division from acting because the Ninth Division first exercised jurisdiction over the matters forming the heart of the dispute and had jurisdiction over all necessary parties in the enforcement action.
- Certiorari relief was not warranted because the record did not clearly establish a plain, manifest, clear, and gross abuse of discretion by the Ninth Division.
Questions Presented
- Whether a writ of prohibition could issue to prevent the Ninth Division from exercising jurisdiction after it had already acted in the guardianship, constructive-trust, and enforcement proceedings.
- Whether the common-law jurisdictional-priority rule required the Sixteenth Division, rather than the Ninth Division, to exercise exclusive jurisdiction over the family settlement agreement.
- Whether the petition should be treated as a petition for a writ of certiorari and granted because the Ninth Division plainly, manifestly, clearly, and grossly abused its discretion.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (11)
- Ulmer v. Circuit Court of Polk County, 366 Ark. 212, 234 S.W.3d 290 (2006)(followed)
- Conner v. Simes, 355 Ark. 422, 139 S.W.3d 476 (2003)(followed)
- Holmes v. Lessenberry, 297 Ark. 23, 759 S.W.2d 37 (1988) (per curiam)(followed)
- Lenser v. McGowan, 358 Ark. 423, 191 S.W.3d 506 (2004)(followed)
- Evans v. Blankenship, 374 Ark. 104, 286 S.W.3d 137 (2008)(followed)
- Patterson v. Isom, 338 Ark. 234, 992 S.W.2d 792 (1999)(followed)
- Tortorich v. Tortorich, 324 Ark. 128, 919 S.W.2d 213 (1996)(followed)
- Askew v. Murdock Acceptance Corp., 225 Ark. 68, 279 S.W.2d 557 (1955)(followed)
- Bradley v. State, 32 Ark. 722 (1878)(followed)
- Edwards v. Nelson, 372 Ark. 300, 275 S.W.3d 158 (2008)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…