Summary
The Supreme Court of Arkansas denied Helen Grinder’s petition for a writ of certiorari challenging an order requiring her to refund $10,000 in allegedly unearned attorney fees as a condition of withdrawal from representation. The court held that Grinder, although a nonparty, had standing to appeal the order because she was directly liable, and that the order was final and appealable. The court did not reach the merits of the underlying fee dispute.
Holdings
- An attorney who is not a party has standing to appeal an order that directly holds the attorney personally liable for a fee, fine, sanction, or other judgment.
- An order requiring Grinder to refund $10,000 was final and appealable because it conclusively resolved the fee dispute and ended a separable branch of the litigation.
- A writ of certiorari will not lie when the petitioner has an adequate alternate remedy, such as an appeal.
Questions Presented
- Whether a nonparty attorney ordered personally to refund allegedly unearned fees has standing to appeal the order.
- Whether the circuit court's fee-refund order was final and appealable.
- Whether the availability of an appeal precluded issuance of a writ of certiorari.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (7)
- Medicanna, LLC v. Ark. Dep't of Fin. & Admin., 2021 Ark. 227(applied)
- Thompson v. McCain, 2013 Ark. 261, 428 S.W.3d 502 (2013)(applied)
- Swindle v. Benton Cnty. Cir. Ct., 363 Ark. 118, 211 S.W.3d 522 (2005)(applied)
- Ford Motor Co. v. Harper, 351 Ark. 559, 95 S.W.3d 810 (2003)(applied)
- Lenders Title Co. v. Chandler, 353 Ark. 339, 107 S.W.3d 157 (2003)(applied)
- Festinger v. Kantor, 264 Ark. 275, 571 S.W.2d 82 (1978)(applied)
- McCain Mall Co. Ltd. P'ship v. Pulaski Cnty. Cir. Ct., 2016 Ark. 279, 495 S.W.3d 625 (2016)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…