Estate of Helen Claire Phelps

223 Cal. App. 3d 332 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990) · California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Four · August 31, 1990 · No. B043887

Summary

The California Court of Appeal held that the trial court erred by permitting a jury trial in an estate petition seeking revocation of a grant deed and quiet title based on lack of mental capacity and undue influence. Because the action presented equitable quiet-title issues and did not allege facts establishing an ejectment-type claim involving possession, there was no right to a jury trial. The judgment was reversed, with directions permitting the trial judge to decide the matter on the existing or additional evidence.

Holdings

  1. A probate proceeding does not carry a right to trial by jury merely because the governing statute requires the petition to set forth facts or permits factual issues to be framed. The right exists only to the extent that a jury trial would be available if the underlying action were brought outside probate.
  2. The quiet title action remained equitable and was not triable by jury because the petition did not allege possession, wrongful withholding, or facts giving the action the character of ejectment.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the probate action to recover the decedent's residence and quiet title carried a right to trial by jury.
  2. Whether the allegations raised possession or an ejectment-like issue sufficient to convert the quiet title action from an equitable action into a legal action triable by jury.

Disposition

reversed

Cases Cited (9)

  • Heiser v. Superior Court, 88 Cal. App. 3d 276 (1979)(followed in part and narrowly construed)
  • Budde v. Superior Court, 97 Cal. App. 2d 615 (1950)(discussed)
  • Estate of Beach, 15 Cal. 3d 623 (1975)(followed)
  • Estate of Perkins, 21 Cal. 2d 561 (1943)(discussed)
  • Estate of Muller, 2 Cal. App. 3d 259 (1969)(discussed)
  • Estate of Baumann, 201 Cal. App. 3d 927 (1988)(followed)
  • Medeiros v. Medeiros, 177 Cal. App. 2d 69 (1960)(distinguished)
  • Rocha v. Rocha, 197 Cal. 396 (1925)(followed)
  • In re Marriage of Skelley, 18 Cal. 3d 365 (1976)(discussed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…