Groth Bros. Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Gallagher

97 Cal. App. 4th 60 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002) · California Court of Appeal · March 26, 2002

Summary

The California Court of Appeal held that a trial court could vacate a voluntary dismissal filed after issuance of an unfavorable tentative ruling on a demurrer. Because the dismissal otherwise would frustrate the tentative-ruling procedure and the statutory scheme for indemnifying corporate agents, the court concluded that Gallagher was entitled to mandatory indemnity based on a dismissal with prejudice following the sustained demurrer.

Holdings

  1. A plaintiff's right to voluntarily dismiss without prejudice is not absolute. Where no opposition was filed to a pending demurrer, the court issued a tentative ruling sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend, and allowing dismissal during the interval before the ruling became final would undermine the tentative-ruling procedure and the statutory indemnification scheme, the trial court may vacate the voluntary dismissal and proceed on the demurrer.
  2. Gallagher was entitled to mandatory indemnification for expenses actually and reasonably incurred in defending the first amended complaint because the directed dismissal with prejudice constituted success on the merits under Corporations Code section 317, subdivision (d).
  3. The court did not need to resolve Gallagher's alternative claim for permissive indemnification because the required dismissal with prejudice entitled him to mandatory indemnification under subdivision (d).

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court had jurisdiction to vacate plaintiff's voluntary dismissal filed after a tentative ruling sustaining Gallagher's demurrer without leave to amend but before the demurrer hearing.
  2. Whether the circumstances required entry of a judgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the action against Gallagher with prejudice.
  3. Whether Gallagher was entitled to mandatory indemnification under Corporations Code section 317, subdivision (d), after the dismissal with prejudice.
  4. Whether Gallagher was entitled to permissive indemnification under Corporations Code section 317, subdivision (e)(4).

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (15)

  • International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co., 9 Cal. 4th 606, 611 (1995)(followed)
  • Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc., 29 Cal. 3d 781 (1981)(followed and limited)
  • Mary Morgan, Inc. v. Melzark, 49 Cal. App. 4th 765 (1996)(followed)
  • Goldtree v. Spreckels, 135 Cal. 666 (1902)(followed)
  • Datner v. Mann Theatres Corp., 145 Cal. App. 3d 768 (1983)(distinguished)
  • M & R Properties v. Thomson, 11 Cal. App. 4th 899 (1992)(followed)
  • Sweat v. Hollister, 37 Cal. App. 4th 603, 614-15 (1995)(followed)
  • Santisas v. Goodin, 17 Cal. 4th 599, 609 n.5 (1998)(limited)
  • Kyle v. Carmon, 71 Cal. App. 4th 901, 915 (1999)(followed)
  • Hartbrodt v. Burke, 42 Cal. App. 4th 168, 175, 178 (1996)(followed by analogy)

Showing top 10 of 15.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from California California Court Of Appeal