Summary
The California Supreme Court held that the exclusionary rule for undisclosed expert witnesses applies at the summary judgment stage. The court overruled Mann v. Cracchiolo and disapproved Kennedy v. Modesto City Hospital, concluding that declarations containing inadmissible expert opinion must be excluded from consideration on summary judgment if an objection is raised. The court affirmed the Court of Appeal's judgment in favor of the defendant.
Holdings
- When a party fails to comply with expert witness disclosure requirements and an objection is raised, the expert opinion must be excluded from consideration at summary judgment because section 437c, subdivision (d) requires declarations to set forth admissible evidence.
Questions Presented
- Whether the exclusionary rule for undisclosed expert witnesses applies at the summary judgment stage.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (9)
- Kennedy v. Modesto City Hospital, 221 Cal. App. 3d 575 (1990)(disapproved)
- Mann v. Cracchiolo, 38 Cal. 3d 18 (1985)(overruled)
- Bozzi v. Nordstrom, Inc., 186 Cal. App. 4th 755 (2010)(cited)
- Towns v. Davidson, 147 Cal. App. 4th 461 (2007)(cited)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 25 Cal. 4th 826 (2001)(cited)
- Caldwell v. Paramount Unified School Dist., 41 Cal. App. 4th 189 (1995)(cited)
- City of Monterey v. Carrnshimba, 215 Cal. App. 4th 1068 (2013)(cited)
- Reid v. Google, Inc., 50 Cal. 4th 512 (2010)(cited)
- Molko v. Holy Spirit Assn., 46 Cal. 3d 1092 (1988)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…