Summary
The California Court of Appeal dismisses an appeal from a mental health commitment order under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act because the order expired and the appeal is moot. The court also holds that Anders/Wende procedures are not required in such appeals, citing Conservatorship of Ben C.
Holdings
- The appeal is dismissed as moot because the 180-day commitment order expired before the opening brief was filed, so any ruling would have no practical impact.
- The court declines to exercise its discretion to retain the appeal because the appeal is moot.
Questions Presented
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed as moot because the 180-day commitment order expired before the opening brief was filed.
- Whether the court should exercise discretion to conduct Anders/Wende review despite the holding in Conservatorship of Ben C.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738(cited)
- People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436(cited)
- Conservatorship of Ben C. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 529(followed)
- Woodward Park Homeowners Assn. v. Garreks, Inc. (2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 880(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…