Summary
The Supreme Court of California held that a first violation of Penal Code section 502.7(a), involving fraudulent avoidance of telephone or telegraph service charges, may be punished as either a misdemeanor or a felony regardless of whether the loss exceeds $400. The court concluded that the statute does not incorporate the $400 grand-theft threshold in Penal Code section 487(a). It reversed the Court of Appeal's judgment and remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- Yes. A first violation of Penal Code section 502.7, subdivision (a), is a misdemeanor-or-felony wobbler, and the statute does not require a loss exceeding $400 before the offense may be punished as a felony.
- No. Penal Code section 502.7(a) does not incorporate section 487(a)'s $400 distinction between grand and petty theft.
Questions Presented
- Whether a first offense under Penal Code section 502.7, subdivision (a), may be punished as a felony when the loss does not exceed $400.
- Whether Penal Code section 502.7, subdivision (a), incorporates the $400 grand-theft threshold in Penal Code section 487, subdivision (a).
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (2)
- People v. Salorse, 62 Cal. 139, 142 (1882)(cited)
- People v. Smith, 268 Cal. App. 2d 117, 119-120, 73 Cal. Rptr. 859 (1968)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…