In re Nora J. Rivera

345 B.R. 229 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2005) · United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno Division · September 29, 2005 · No. 05-10567-B-13

Summary

The bankruptcy court granted the Internal Revenue Service relief from the automatic stay to offset the debtor's 2004 income tax overpayment against prepetition tax liabilities. The court held that the IRS's statutory right of setoff under 26 U.S.C. § 6402(a) and 11 U.S.C. § 553(a) was not impaired by the confirmed Chapter 13 plan. The court denied sanctions because any stay violation was promptly remedied, caused no actual damages, and was not egregious or undertaken in bad faith.

Holdings

  1. A confirmed chapter 13 plan does not impair the IRS's statutory right under 11 U.S.C. § 553(a) to offset a prepetition tax overpayment against a prepetition tax liability because § 1327(a) is not an exception identified in § 553(a).
  2. The IRS was entitled to relief from the automatic stay to credit the debtor's 2004 income-tax overpayment against the priority portion of its prepetition tax claim.
  3. Sanctions were not appropriate because the record did not establish actual damages or conduct that was egregious, vindictive, malicious, or in bad faith, and any setoff was promptly reversed.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the IRS's statutory right to offset a prepetition tax overpayment against a prepetition tax liability was impaired by the debtor's confirmed chapter 13 plan under 11 U.S.C. § 1327(a).
  2. Whether the IRS was entitled to relief from the automatic stay to exercise the statutory setoff right.
  3. Whether the IRS's levy notices or attempted setoff warranted sanctions, actual damages, or punitive damages under 11 U.S.C. § 362(h).

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (12)

  • Internal Revenue Service v. Luongo (In re Luongo), 259 F.3d 323 (5th Cir. 2001)(followed)
  • In re Buckenmaier, 127 B.R. 233 (9th Cir. BAP 1991)(discussed)
  • In re Davis, 889 F.2d 658, 661 (5th Cir. 1989)(followed)
  • Schwartz v. United States (In re Schwartz), 954 F.2d 569, 570-72 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Citizens Bank of Maryland v. Strumpf, 516 U.S. 16, 116 S. Ct. 286, 290, 133 L. Ed. 2d 258 (1995)(followed)
  • United States v. Ketelsen (In re Ketelsen), 880 F.2d 990, 993 (8th Cir. 1989)(discussed)
  • Crysen/Montenay Energy Co. v. Esselen Assocs., Inc. (In re Crysen-Montenay Energy Co.), 902 F.2d 1098, 1105 (2d Cir. 1990)(discussed)
  • McHenry v. Key Bank (In re McHenry), 179 B.R. 165, 168-69 (9th Cir. BAP 1995)(followed)
  • Cox v. Billy Pounds Motors, Inc. (In re Cox), 214 B.R. 635, 646 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 1997)(followed)
  • Knaus v. Concordia Lumber Co. (In re Knaus), 889 F.2d 773 (8th Cir. 1989)(distinguished)

Showing top 10 of 12.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…