Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Welles

7 F. Supp. 2d 1098 (S.D. Cal. 1998) · United States District Court for the Southern District of California · May 21, 1998 · No. 98-CV-0413-K (JFS)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of California denied Playboy Enterprises, Inc.'s motion for a preliminary injunction against Terri Welles. The court held that Welles's use of the terms "Playmate of the Year 1981" and "PMOY '81" to identify herself, as well as her use of Playboy-related terms in website meta tags, constituted fair use and was unlikely to cause consumer confusion or support a dilution claim. The court therefore found insufficient likelihood of success on the merits and denied preliminary injunctive relief.

Holdings

  1. Welles's use of "Playmate of the Year 1981" to identify herself was a descriptive, fair, and good-faith use protected by 15 U.S.C. § 1115(b)(4). The related use of "PMOY '81" was also permissible because it referred to the same title.
  2. Welles's use of Playboy and Playmate in the meta tags of her website did not constitute trademark infringement because she used the terms in good faith to index and describe the website's content.
  3. Even apart from the fair-use defense, Playboy Enterprises failed to show a likelihood of consumer confusion sufficient to establish likely success on its trademark claims.
  4. Playboy Enterprises failed to demonstrate likely success on its dilution claim because Welles's use of the marks was fair use and served to identify herself and her services.
  5. Playboy Enterprises was not entitled to a preliminary injunction because it failed to show a strong likelihood of success on the merits and did not establish that the balance of hardships justified relief.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Welles's use of "Playmate of the Year 1981" and "PMOY '81" on her website was protected fair use under 15 U.S.C. § 1115(b)(4).
  2. Whether Welles's use of Playboy and Playmate in website meta tags constituted trademark infringement or false designation of origin.
  3. Whether Playboy Enterprises demonstrated a likelihood of success on its trademark dilution claim under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c).
  4. Whether Playboy Enterprises satisfied the standard for a preliminary injunction.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (14)

  • Vision Sports v. Melville, 888 F.2d 609, 612 (9th Cir. 1989)(followed)
  • Rodeo Collection v. West Seventh, 812 F.2d 1215, 1217 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
  • Topanga Press, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 989 F.2d 1524, 1528 (9th Cir. 1993)(followed)
  • Dr. Seuss Enters. v. Penguin Books USA, Inc., 924 F. Supp. 1559, 1574 (S.D. Cal. 1996), aff'd, 109 F.3d 1394 (9th Cir. 1997)(followed)
  • New Kids on the Block v. New Am. Pub., Inc., 971 F.2d 302, 305-06 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Playboy Enters., Inc. v. Chuckleberry Publ'g, Inc., 687 F.2d 563, 566-67 (2d Cir. 1982)(followed)
  • WCVB-TV v. Boston Athletic Ass'n, 926 F.2d 42, 44 (1st Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • Metro Publ'g Ltd. v. San Jose Mercury News, 987 F.2d 637, 640 (9th Cir. 1993)(followed)
  • Century 21 Real Estate Corp. v. Sandlin, 846 F.2d 1175, 1178-79 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
  • Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Church, 411 F.2d 350, 352 (9th Cir. 1969)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…