Summary
The Colorado Supreme Court reversed the trial court’s grant of Frank Vigil Jr.’s Crim. P. 35(c) motion for post-conviction relief. Relying on its contemporaneous decision in Jensen v. People, the court held that Miller v. Alabama does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review of a final judgment. Justice Hood dissented, joined by Justice Hobbs; Justice Boatright did not participate.
Holdings
- Miller does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review of a final judgment. Because Vigil's judgment was final and he challenged it through a Crim. P. 35(c) motion, Miller did not apply to his sentence.
- The trial court erred in granting Vigil's Crim. P. 35(c) motion because Miller did not apply retroactively to his final judgment.
Questions Presented
- Whether Miller v. Alabama applies retroactively to cases on collateral review of a final judgment.
- Whether the trial court properly granted Vigil's Crim. P. 35(c) motion and ordered a new sentencing hearing if Miller applied retroactively.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (4)
- Jensen v. People, 2015 CO 42, 352 P.3d 959(followed)
- Miller v. Alabama, Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455, 183 L. Ed. 2d 407 (2012)(applied)
- People v. Tate, 2015 CO 42, 352 P.3d 959(followed)
- People v. Vigil, No. 98CA0689 (Colo. App. July 29, 1999)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…