Summary
The Connecticut Appellate Court dismissed Earl Thompson’s appeal from the trial court’s judgment granting summary judgment against his petition for a new trial. The court held that, under General Statutes § 54-95 (a) and Santiago v. State, the appeal could not be entertained because Thompson had not obtained certification to appeal.
Holdings
- An appellate court should decline to entertain an appeal challenging the denial of a petition for a new trial until the petitioner has first sought certification to appeal under § 54-95 (a). Because Thompson failed to obtain certification before filing his appeal, the appeal was dismissed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Connecticut Appellate Court should entertain an appeal from a judgment functionally equivalent to a judgment denying a petition for a new trial when the petitioner failed to obtain the certification required by General Statutes § 54-95 (a).
- Whether the petitioner's challenge to the allegedly untimely filing of the respondent's summary-judgment motion could be considered without the required certification.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (1)
- Santiago v. State, 261 Conn. 533, 804 A.2d 801 (2002)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…