Summary
The Connecticut Supreme Court dismissed the defendant’s appeal as improvidently granted. The court reformulated the certified question concerning an unpreserved challenge to the admission of DNA evidence from a buccal swab taken after the defendant invoked his right to counsel, but did not reach the merits.
Holdings
- The certified question was reformulated to address whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the defendant's unpreserved challenge to admission of the buccal-swab evidence did not present a question of constitutional magnitude.
- The appeal was dismissed because certification had been improvidently granted.
Questions Presented
- Whether the certified question accurately stated the issue actually presented and decided on appeal.
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed because certification had been improvidently granted after the defendant failed to challenge the Appellate Court's conclusion that the buccal-swab challenge was unpreserved.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- State v. Marrero-Alejandro, 159 Conn. App. 376, 396-398, 122 A.3d 272 (2015)(applied)
- State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239-240, 567 A.2d 823 (1989)(applied)
- State v. Ouellette, 295 Conn. 173, 184, 989 A.2d 1048 (2010)(applied)
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp., 276 Conn. 168, 191, 884 A.2d 981 (2005)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…