Summary
The Eighth District Court of Appeals of Texas dismissed Devoris Antoine Newson’s attempted appeal for want of jurisdiction. The court held that no appealable written order denying his pretrial habeas application appeared in the record, the habeas proceeding was moot because the underlying criminal case had been dismissed, and a defendant may not appeal the dismissal of a criminal charge.
Holdings
- A written trial-court order is a prerequisite to invoking the court of appeals' jurisdiction in a habeas proceeding; an oral pronouncement on the record is not an appealable order.
- A pretrial habeas application is moot when the underlying offense is dismissed and the applicant is released from confinement on that charge.
- A criminal defendant may not appeal a trial court's order dismissing a charge against the defendant.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court of appeals had jurisdiction over an attempted appeal from the trial court's oral denial of a pretrial habeas application when no written order had been signed.
- Whether the pretrial habeas application became moot after the underlying criminal charge was dismissed and Newson was released from confinement.
- Whether the notice of appeal could be construed as an appeal from the dismissal of the underlying criminal charge.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (10)
- Ex parte Perez, No. 14-13-01048-CR, 2014 WL 4416011, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 9, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication)(followed)
- State v. Sonavongxay, 407 S.W.3d 252, 258-59 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012)(followed)
- State v. Wachtendorf, 475 S.W.3d 895, 904 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015)(followed)
- State v. Nassour, 706 S.W.3d 627, 633 (Tex. App.—Austin 2024, pet. dism'd) (per curiam)(followed)
- Ex parte Wiley, 949 S.W.2d 3, 4 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no writ)(followed)
- Ex parte Davis, No. 12-20-00141-CR, 2020 WL 6164465, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Tyler Oct. 21, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication)(followed)
- Ex parte Huerta, 582 S.W.3d 407, 410-11 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2018, pet. ref'd)(followed)
- Kozitzki v. State, No. 04-23-00511-CR, 2023 WL 3856707, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio June 7, 2023, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (per curiam)(followed)
- Bohannon v. State, 352 S.W.3d 47, 48 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, pet. ref'd)(followed)
- Petty v. State, 800 S.W.2d 582, 583-84 (Tex. App.—Tyler 1990, no pet.) (per curiam)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…