Carlin David Staples, Jr. v. The State of Texas

No. 01-25-00468-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] May 28, 2026) (mem. op.) · Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas · May 28, 2026 · No. 01-25-00468-CR

Summary

The First Court of Appeals of Texas affirmed Carlin David Staples, Jr.’s convictions and consecutive sentences for four counts of sexual assault of a child. The court held that recorded jail telephone calls were sufficiently authenticated and that the consecutive sentences were not grossly disproportionate under the federal or Texas constitutions.

Holdings

  1. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting the recorded jail calls because the State supplied sufficient direct and circumstantial evidence to support a reasonable jury determination that the recordings were authentic.
  2. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by ordering the four prison sentences to run consecutively; Staples failed to establish that the resulting punishment was grossly disproportionate under the Eighth Amendment or the Texas Constitution.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting recorded jail telephone calls during the punishment phase without additional testimony from a person familiar with the jail's recording mechanism.
  2. Whether ordering four sentences to run consecutively resulted in grossly disproportionate punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 13 of the Texas Constitution.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (35)

  • Fowler v. State, 544 S.W.3d 844, 848 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018)(followed)
  • Reed v. State, 811 S.W.2d 582, 587 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)(followed)
  • Morris v. State, 460 S.W.3d 190, 196 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2015, no pet.)(followed)
  • Mosley v. State, 355 S.W.3d 59, 69 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2011, pet. ref'd)(followed)
  • Butler v. State, 459 S.W.3d 595, 600, 602 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015)(followed)
  • Wallace v. State, 782 S.W.2d 854, 858 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989)(followed)
  • Tienda v. State, 358 S.W.3d 633, 638 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012)(followed)
  • Druery v. State, 225 S.W.3d 491, 502 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007)(followed)
  • Diamond v. State, 496 S.W.3d 124, 142 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, pet. ref'd)(followed)
  • Banargent v. State, 228 S.W.3d 393, 401 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. ref'd)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 35.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…