Ernest Pedro Romero v. Asif Mahmood

No. 01-25-00949-CV (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 30, 2026) · Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas · April 30, 2026 · No. 01-25-00949-CV

Summary

The Texas Court of Appeals for the First District dismissed an appeal from a forcible detainer judgment as moot after the appellant was evicted and the appellee regained possession. The court concluded that the appellant had not asserted a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession. It granted the motion to dismiss, dismissed the appeal, and vacated the trial court’s judgment of possession.

Holdings

  1. After an appellant is evicted and the appellee regains possession, an appeal from a forcible detainer judgment is moot unless the appellant asserts a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession.
  2. When an appeal from a forcible detainer action becomes moot, the proper disposition is to dismiss the appeal and vacate the lower court's judgment of possession.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Romero's appeal from the forcible detainer judgment became moot after he was evicted and Mahmood regained possession.
  2. Whether Romero asserted a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession sufficient to preserve a live controversy.
  3. Whether the appellate court should dismiss the moot appeal and vacate the trial court's judgment of possession.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (9)

  • Strange v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. as Tr. for Registered Holders of Long Beach Mortg. Loan Tr. 2004-4, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2004-4, No. 01-23-00575-CV, 2024 WL 1862860 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 30, 2024, no pet.) (mem. op.)(followed)
  • Richardson v. Daka Investments, LLC, No. 02-20-00360-CV, 2021 WL 4621762 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Oct. 7, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op.)(followed)
  • De La Garza v. Riverstone Apartments, No. 04-06-00732-CV, 2007 WL 3270769 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Nov. 7, 2007, no pet.) (mem. op.)(followed)
  • Marshall v. Hous. Auth. of City of San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 785, 787 (Tex. 2006)(followed)
  • Gallien v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp., No. 01-07-00075-CV, 2008 WL 4670465 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 23, 2008, pet. dism'd w.o.j.) (mem. op.)(followed)
  • Holloway v. Revelstoke Venture, LLC, No. 02-23-00375-CV, 2024 WL 191221 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 18, 2024, pet. denied) (mem. op.)(followed)
  • Barnes v. Stone Way Ltd. P'ship, 330 S.W.3d 925, 929 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2011, no pet.)(followed)
  • Kennedy v. Andover Place Apartments, 203 S.W.3d 495, 497 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, no pet.)(followed)
  • Coinmach Corp. v. Aspenwood Apartment Corp., 417 S.W.3d 909, 919 (Tex. 2013)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…