Summary
The Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction after the trial court granted a new trial. Because the original judgment was set aside and no final appealable judgment remained, the court also dismissed all pending motions as moot.
Holdings
- When the trial court grants a new trial after an appeal is filed, the original judgment is set aside, leaving no final appealable judgment; the appellate court therefore lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.
- All pending motions must be dismissed as moot after the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Questions Presented
- Whether the appellate court retained jurisdiction over an appeal after the trial court granted a new trial and set aside the original judgment.
- Whether the parties' joint motion to abate the appeal should be granted or the appeal should instead be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
- Whether pending motions should be dismissed as moot after dismissal of the appeal.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001)(followed)
- Markowitz v. Markowitz, 118 S.W.3d 82, 88 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. denied)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…