Summary
The Ninth Court of Appeals of Texas considers whether the trial court properly determined East Texas Educational Insurance Association’s workers’ compensation subrogation lien during a settlement hearing. The court holds that the trial court abused its discretion by summarily adjudicating the carrier’s claim and effectively denying reimbursement for medical benefits without a trial on the merits or summary-judgment proceedings. The court reverses and remands for further proceedings.
Holdings
- A trial court may not resolve disputed fact issues concerning a workers' compensation carrier's subrogation claim and reimbursement amount simply through a settlement-related motion and hearing. The dispute must be resolved by a trial on the merits, a properly conducted summary-judgment proceeding, a valid settlement agreement, or another method authorized by the procedural rules.
- Under Texas Labor Code section 417.002(a), a workers' compensation carrier has a mandatory right to reimbursement from the net amount recovered in a third-party action for benefits, including medical benefits, paid for the compensable injury; the carrier is entitled to the first money up to the amount of benefits paid.
- Remand, rather than rendition of judgment on the $350,000 medical-benefit payment, was required because the lack of procedural due process prevented a valid adjudication of the merits.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court improperly adjudicated ETEIA's workers' compensation subrogation claim and reimbursement amount at a settlement hearing rather than through a trial on the merits, summary judgment, or another procedurally authorized method.
- Whether the trial court summarily put ETEIA to trial in violation of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 245 and due process.
- Whether the trial court erred by failing to award reimbursement for ETEIA's $350,000 payment to TRS-ActiveCare for medical benefits.
- Whether ETEIA waived its complaints concerning notice, the reimbursement amount, and Texas Labor Code sections 409.009 and 409.0091.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (17)
- Toyota Motor Co. v. Cook, 581 S.W.3d 278, 281-82 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2019, no pet.)(followed for background)
- Tex. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ledbetter, 251 S.W.3d 31, 34-39 (Tex. 2008)(followed)
- Capitol Aggregates, Inc. v. Great Am. Ins. Co., 408 S.W.2d 922, 923-24 (Tex. 1966)(followed)
- Fort Worth Lloyds v. Haygood, 246 S.W.2d 865, 868 (Tex. 1952)(followed)
- Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Baker, 87 S.W.3d 526, 530 (Tex. 2002)(followed)
- Diamond Hydraulics, Inc. v. GAC Equip., LLC, No. 24-1049, 2026 WL 844386, at *2 (Tex. Mar. 27, 2026)(followed)
- Huynh v. Blanchard, 694 S.W.3d 648, 674 (Tex. 2024)(followed)
- In re B.C., 579 S.W.3d 432, 435 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2019), aff’d, 592 S.W.3d 133 (Tex. 2019)(followed)
- In re I.L.S., 339 S.W.3d 156, 159 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2011, no pet.)(followed)
- Highsmith v. Highsmith, 587 S.W.3d 771, 778 (Tex. 2019)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…