In re Alvis Ray Coker Jr.

No. 09-25-00522-CV · Court of Appeals for the Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont · January 5, 2026 · No. No. 09-25-00522-CV

Summary

The Ninth Court of Appeals of Texas denied Alvis Ray Coker Jr.’s petition for a writ of mandamus and request for temporary relief. The court held that the September 24, 2025 order in the partition proceeding was appealable and that Coker had not shown he lacked an adequate remedy by appeal.

Holdings

  1. Coker was not entitled to mandamus relief because he had an adequate remedy by appeal.
  2. The September 24, 2025 order was an appealable first-stage order in a partition proceeding.
  3. The request for temporary relief was denied.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Coker established entitlement to mandamus relief by showing that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he lacked an adequate remedy by appeal.
  2. Whether the trial court's September 24, 2025 order was an appealable first-stage partition order.
  3. Whether Coker was entitled to temporary relief pending resolution of the mandamus proceeding.

Disposition

writ_denied

Cases Cited (6)

  • In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
  • Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
  • In re Team Rocket, L.P., 256 S.W.3d 257, 262 (Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
  • Griffin v. Wolfe, 610 S.W.2d 466, 466 (Tex. 1980)(followed)
  • Bowman v. Stephens, 569 S.W.3d 210, 221-22 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2018, no pet.)(followed)
  • Rogers v. Coslett, 646 S.W.3d 1(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…