Summary
The Ninth Court of Appeals of Texas denied Jodi Buttarazzi-El Shariff and Dawn Buttarazzi’s petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. The relators sought to compel the probate court to rule on an ADA Title II request for reasonable modifications, reconsider a motion to reinstate, and clarify the claims remaining for trial.
Holdings
- Relators did not show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion or that they lacked an adequate remedy by appeal; therefore, they were not entitled to a writ of mandamus.
- The motion for temporary relief was denied.
Questions Presented
- Whether relators demonstrated a clear abuse of discretion and lack of an adequate remedy by appeal sufficient to warrant mandamus relief.
- Whether relators were entitled to temporary relief while their mandamus petition was pending.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (2)
- In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
- Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…