Summary
The Ninth District Court of Appeals of Texas affirmed the trial court’s judgment revoking Matthew Wade Grogan’s deferred adjudication community supervision, adjudicating him guilty of indecency with a child, and sentencing him to seven years of confinement. The court conducted an Anders review and concluded that the appeal presented no arguable grounds for reversal.
Holdings
- After conducting a full examination of the record and reviewing appointed counsel's Anders brief, the court found no arguable grounds for reversal and concluded that the appeal was wholly frivolous.
- The court was not required to appoint new counsel to rebrief the appeal because its full review of the record disclosed no arguable grounds for reversal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Anders appeal presented any arguable grounds for reversal after independent review of the record and appointed counsel's brief.
- Whether the court of appeals was required to appoint new counsel to rebrief the appeal.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)(followed)
- High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978)(followed)
- Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988)(followed)
- Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)(followed)
- Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)(applied by analogy)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…