Summary
The Court of Appeals for the Second Appellate District of Texas affirmed the trial court’s judgment adjudicating Mackenzie Logan George’s guilt and sentencing her to 360 days in jail. The court held that a preponderance of the evidence supported findings that George violated her deferred-adjudication probation by failing to report and rejected her arguments concerning intent, illness, and misunderstanding of her reporting obligations.
Holdings
- The State was not required to prove that George intentionally or knowingly failed to report because the amended petition alleged only that she failed to report as instructed, and the applicable revocation standard required proof by a preponderance of the evidence that she violated a probation condition.
- A probation officer's testimony was sufficient to support the findings by a preponderance of the evidence even though the officer was not an eyewitness to every alleged missed report.
- The evidence supported the trial court's findings that George violated the reporting conditions, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion by adjudicating guilt.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court abused its discretion by adjudicating George guilty after finding that she violated her probation conditions by failing to report, where the State allegedly failed to prove that the failures were intentional or knowing.
- Whether testimony from a probation officer who did not personally witness all of the missed reporting dates was sufficient to prove the probation violations by a preponderance of the evidence.
- Whether George's health problems or asserted misunderstanding of her continuing reporting obligation defeated the failure-to-report allegations.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (11)
- Hongpathoum v. State, 578 S.W.3d 213, 214 n.1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2019, no pet.)(followed)
- Euler v. State, 218 S.W.3d 88, 89 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007)(followed)
- Bryant v. State, 391 S.W.3d 86, 93 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012)(followed)
- Rickels v. State, 202 S.W.3d 759, 763-64 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)(followed)
- Hacker v. State, 389 S.W.3d 860, 865 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013)(followed)
- Cardona v. State, 665 S.W.2d 492, 493-94 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburg 1984, no pet.)(followed)
- Johnson v. State, 2 S.W.3d 685, 687-88 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1999, no pet.)(followed)
- Bibbs v. State, No. 02-24-00285-CR, 2025 WL 2552337, at *4-5 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Sept. 4, 2025, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication)(followed)
- Brown v. State, 354 S.W.3d 518, 519 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, pet. ref'd) (mem. op.)(followed)
- Brimzy v. State, 726 S.W.3d 379 (Tex. Crim. App. 2025)(abrogated)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…