Summary
The Seventh District Court of Appeals of Texas reviewed an Anders appeal from the adjudication of guilt for evading arrest with a motor vehicle. The court independently examined the record, found no non-frivolous issues, affirmed the judgment adjudicating guilt, and granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw.
Holdings
- After independently examining the record and counsel's Anders brief, the court found no nonfrivolous issue that could support reversal.
- The record supported the trial court's adjudication of guilt because Brown's pleas of true to the alleged violations alone supported the ruling.
- The record presented no nonfrivolous challenge that the thirty-year sentence was grossly disproportionate to the original, double-enhanced offense.
Questions Presented
- Whether the record presented any nonfrivolous issue requiring reversal in Brown's Anders appeal.
- Whether the trial court abused its discretion in adjudicating Brown guilty based on his admitted violations of community supervision.
- Whether Brown's thirty-year sentence was grossly disproportionate to the original offense.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (7)
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45 (1967)(applied)
- In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406, 408-09, 411 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008)(applied)
- High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978)(applied)
- Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988)(applied)
- Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)(applied)
- Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137, 138 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969)(applied)
- Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…