Nathaniel Allen Huffman v. the State of Texas

No. 07-25-00205-CR · Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo · February 4, 2026 · No. 07-25-00205-CR

Summary

The Seventh Court of Appeals of Texas at Amarillo reviewed an Anders appeal from a judgment convicting Nathaniel Allen Huffman of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and sentencing him to seventeen years in prison. The court found no arguable grounds for appeal, modified the judgment to correct clerical errors concerning the enhancement and waiver of appeal, affirmed as modified, and granted counsel's motion to withdraw.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
Writing for the Court
Lawrence M. Doss; Parker, C.J.; Doss, J.; Yarbrough, J.
Jurisdiction
Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
Decision date
February 4, 2026
Docket number
07-25-00205-CR
Procedural posture
Huffman appealed a judgment adjudicating him guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon after an open guilty plea and a plea of true to a felony enhancement. Appointed counsel filed an Anders brief and moved to withdraw.
Standard of review
The court independently reviewed the entire record for arguable grounds for appeal under Anders and reviewed the judgment for clerical errors that could be corrected by reformation.
Precedential value
Nonprecedential memorandum opinion; marked 'Do not publish.'
Parties
Nathaniel Allen Huffman v. The State of Texas
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

appellate procedurecriminal procedureright to counsel

Practice areas

criminal appellate practicecriminal procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether appointed counsel satisfied the requirements for withdrawal under Anders v. California by filing a brief demonstrating that the record presented no arguable grounds for appeal.
  2. Whether the appellate court could modify the judgment to correct clerical errors that omitted the enhancement to which Huffman pleaded true and incorrectly stated that his right to appeal was waived.

Holdings

  1. Counsel's Anders brief and motion to withdraw satisfied the applicable requirements, and the independent review of the record disclosed no arguable grounds for appeal.
  2. The court could modify the judgment to correct clerical errors because the necessary information appeared in the record.

Key quotations

In Texas, an Anders brief need not specifically advance ‘arguable’ points of error if counsel finds none, but it must provide record references to the facts and procedural history and set out pertinent legal authorities. (2)

Factual background

Huffman was asked to leave a Toot'n Totum convenience store because of a history of theft from the business. He threatened the assistant manager with a knife and was arrested. He pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and pleaded true to a felony enhancement from Arizona; the trial court sentenced him to seventeen years in prison.

Procedural history

Huffman was charged in the 108th District Court of Potter County, Texas, pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and pleaded true to an Arizona felony enhancement. The trial court imposed a seventeen-year prison sentence. On appeal, appointed counsel filed an Anders brief asserting that no arguable grounds existed. The Court of Appeals independently reviewed the record, corrected two clerical errors in the judgment, granted counsel's motion to withdraw, and affirmed the judgment as reformed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…