Summary
The Thirteenth Court of Appeals of Texas denied Kerry L. Burke’s pro se petition for writ of mandamus seeking release from imprisonment on a personal bond. The court held that Burke did not meet the burden required to obtain mandamus relief and granted his motion to proceed without payment of costs.
Holdings
- A relator seeking mandamus relief in a criminal case must establish both that the act sought to be compelled is ministerial and does not involve a discretionary or judicial decision, and that there is no adequate remedy at law.
- The relator bears the burden to properly request mandamus relief and provide a sufficient record establishing the right to that relief.
Questions Presented
- Whether Burke established entitlement to mandamus relief compelling the trial court to release him from imprisonment on a personal bond.
- Whether Burke demonstrated that the act sought was ministerial, that he lacked an adequate remedy at law, and that the record established his right to relief.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (7)
- In re Meza, 611 S.W.3d 383, 388 (Tex. Crim. App. 2020) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
- In re Harris, 491 S.W.3d 332, 334 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam)(followed)
- In re McCann, 422 S.W.3d 701, 704 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
- State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Jud. Dist. Ct. of Apps. at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
- In re Pena, 619 S.W.3d 837, 839 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2021, orig. proceeding)(followed)
- Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding) (per curiam)(followed)
- In re Schreck, 642 S.W.3d 925, 927 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2022, orig. proceeding)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…