State v. Brownlee

A26A0251 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · June 29, 2026 · No. A26A0251

Summary

The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s suppression of statements made by Marquavius Brownlee, a deputy under administrative leave, during a voluntary GBI interview. The court held that the record did not show an express employment threat or sufficient evidence that Brownlee subjectively and reasonably believed he would lose his job if he declined to cooperate, as required under Garrity and Georgia’s totality-of-the-circumstances test.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decision date
June 29, 2026
Docket number
A26A0251
Disposition
reversed

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Brownlee's statements during the GBI interview were involuntary under Garrity and Georgia's totality-of-the-circumstances test despite the absence of an express threat of employment termination.
  2. Whether the trial court clearly erred by finding that Brownlee subjectively believed his employment was in jeopardy and that the interview setting compelled his cooperation when Brownlee did not testify and the record contained no evidence supporting those findings.

Holdings

  1. Absent an express threat of termination, voluntariness is determined under the totality of the circumstances by examining whether the defendant subjectively believed that failure to cooperate could result in job loss and whether that belief was objectively reasonable in light of the state action involved.
  2. Brownlee's statements were voluntary because the record lacked evidence that he subjectively believed his employment was in jeopardy if he failed to answer, and the agents expressly informed him that the investigation was criminal, unrelated to his job, and voluntary.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…