Thompson v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.

2026-Ohio-720 · Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth Appellate District · March 3, 2026 · No. 25AP-561

Summary

The Tenth District Court of Appeals of Ohio dismissed Chesney Nicole Thompson’s petition for a writ of mandamus against the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation and the Industrial Commission of Ohio. The court held that the petition failed to comply with the captioning requirement of R.C. 2731.04 because it was not brought in the name of the state on the relation of the applicant. The court adopted the magistrate’s findings and conclusions, rendered the remaining objections and pending motions moot, and dismissed the writ.

Holdings

  1. A mandamus petition that is not brought in the name of the State on the relation of the person applying fails to comply with R.C. 2731.04, and that defect is grounds for sua sponte dismissal.
  2. The objections addressing the adequacy of a legal remedy and the merits of the mandamus petition were rendered moot after the court dismissed the petition for failure to comply with R.C. 2731.04.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the petition for a writ of mandamus was subject to dismissal because it was not brought in the name of the State on the relation of the person applying, as required by R.C. 2731.04.
  2. Whether the remaining objections concerning the adequacy of a legal remedy and the merits of the mandamus petition were moot after dismissal on the captioning ground.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (49)

  • Salemi v. Cleveland Metroparks, 2016-Ohio-1192, ¶ 15(distinguished)
  • State ex rel. Harper v. Perlatti, 2025-Ohio-1313(followed)
  • Wright v. Application for Relief from Disability, 2025-Ohio-1425, ¶¶ 5-6 (10th Dist.)(followed)
  • State ex rel. Doe v. Gallia Cty. Common Pleas Court, 2018-Ohio-2168, ¶ 8(followed)
  • Shoop v. State, 2015-Ohio-2068, ¶ 10(followed)
  • Blankenship v. Blackwell, 2004-Ohio-5596, ¶ 34(followed)
  • Ashley v. Kevin O’Brien & Assocs. Co., L.P.A., 2022-Ohio-24, ¶ 10 (10th Dist.)(followed)
  • Kenard v. Tucker, 2005-Ohio-6834, ¶ 7 (2d Dist.)(followed)
  • Maloney v. Court of Common Pleas of Allen Cty., 173 Ohio St. 226 (1962)(followed)
  • Davis v. Lucas Cty. Prosecutor’s Office, 2002-Ohio-4657, ¶ 3 (6th Dist.)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 49.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Court Of Appeals Of Ohio Tenth Appellate District Court Of Appeals Of Ohio Tenth Appellate District