Summary
The Eighth District Court of Appeals of Texas dismissed Richard Terence Jenkins’s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction because it sought relief against a justice court. The court also dismissed Jenkins’s emergency motion as moot.
Holdings
- The Court of Appeals lacks jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a justice court or justice of the peace unless the writ is necessary to enforce the appellate court's jurisdiction; Jenkins made no such showing.
- The emergency motion for relief was dismissed as moot because the mandamus petition was dismissed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction to issue mandamus relief against a justice court or justice of the peace.
- Whether Jenkins's emergency motion should be dismissed as moot after dismissal of the mandamus petition.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- In re Anguiano, No. 13-23-00490-CV, 2023 WL 7932474, at *1 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg Nov. 16, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.)(followed)
- In re Castro, No. 02-23-00489-CV, 2024 WL 23627, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 2, 2024, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…