Summary
The Sixth Court of Appeals of Texas denied Christy Lynne Powell’s petition for a writ of mandamus seeking relief from trial court sanctions orders. The court held that Powell failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.7(a)(1) because her appendix omitted the motions for sanctions, and it denied her emergency motion to stay enforcement as moot.
Holdings
- A relator is not entitled to mandamus relief when the mandamus record fails to include certified or sworn copies of every material document filed in the underlying proceeding, including the motion upon which the challenged order is based.
- The emergency motion to stay enforcement of the sanctions orders is moot after the court denied the petition for writ of mandamus.
Questions Presented
- Whether Powell was entitled to mandamus relief from the trial court's sanctions orders when her mandamus appendix omitted the motions for sanctions underlying those orders.
- Whether Powell's emergency motion to stay enforcement of the sanctions orders should be granted.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (7)
- In re Blakeney, 254 S.W.3d 659, 661 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2008, orig. proceeding)(followed)
- Cantu v. Longoria, 878 S.W.2d 131 (Tex. 1994) (per curiam) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
- Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
- In re John Gannon, Inc., No. 14-21-00005-CV, 2021 WL 1307248, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Apr. 8, 2021, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.)(followed)
- In re Fields, No. 14-17-00640-CV, 2017 WL 3495396, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 15, 2017, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.)(followed)
- In re Sampson, No. 06-25-00141-CR, 2025 WL 2811337, at *1 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Oct. 3, 2025, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.)(followed)
- In re Lynch, No. 06-25-00029-CV, 2025 WL 1131395, at *1 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Apr. 17, 2025, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…