Robert Wayne Dugan II v. the State of Texas

No. 06-26-00027-CR · Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana · June 11, 2026 · No. No. 06-26-00027-CR

Summary

The Sixth Court of Appeals of Texas at Texarkana affirmed the trial court’s judgment after Robert Wayne Dugan II pleaded guilty to first-degree felony manufacture or delivery of methamphetamine and received a twenty-four-year prison sentence. Applying Anders v. California, the court found no arguable issues supporting the appeal, granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw, and concluded the appeal was wholly frivolous.

Holdings

  1. Counsel's professional evaluation of the record, explaining why no arguable grounds for appeal existed, satisfied the requirements of Anders.
  2. The appeal was wholly frivolous and no arguable issue supported reversal; the trial court's judgment was therefore affirmed.
  3. The court granted counsel's motion to withdraw and appointed no substitute counsel.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether appointed appellate counsel satisfied the requirements of Anders v. California by filing a brief demonstrating that the record presented no genuinely arguable grounds for appeal.
  2. Whether independent review of the appellate record revealed any arguable issue or reversible error requiring reversal of the judgment.
  3. Whether appellate counsel should be permitted to withdraw after the court determined that the appeal was wholly frivolous.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (5)

  • Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 743-44 (1967)(followed)
  • In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
  • Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)(followed)
  • High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812-13 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978)(followed)
  • Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…