Summary
The Delaware Supreme Court held that the Superior Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over a condominium dispute seeking removal of an addition allegedly encroaching on common-area airspace. The court determined that ejectment could not provide possession of airspace and that the requested removal constituted equitable relief available only through a mandatory injunction in the Court of Chancery. The judgment was reversed and the matter remanded.
Holdings
- Ejectment is unavailable to recover possession of airspace because airspace is an incorporeal hereditament on which entry cannot be made and of which the sheriff cannot deliver possession.
- The Superior Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the complaint sought equitable relief in the form of a mandatory injunction requiring removal of part of a building.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Superior Court had subject matter jurisdiction over an action styled as ejectment when the plaintiff sought removal of a structure allegedly encroaching on condominium common-element airspace.
- Whether ejectment may be used to obtain possession of incorporeal airspace and whether the requested removal of the structure constituted equitable relief available only through a mandatory injunction.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (3)
- Diebold Computer Leasing, Inc. v. Commercial Credit Corp., 267 A.2d 586, 588 (Del. 1970)(followed)
- Suplee v. Eckert, 120 A.2d 718, 719-20 (Del. Ch. 1956)(followed)
- Burris v. Cross, 583 A.2d 1364 (1990)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…