Summary
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Chancery's certification of a stockholder class action alongside a derivative action challenging Loral Space & Communications' transaction with MHR Fund Management. The court held that direct and derivative claims arising from the same corporate transaction may be litigated concurrently. It also upheld the award of $10,627,587 in attorneys' fees and expenses to class counsel, finding no abuse of discretion.
Holdings
- Direct and derivative claims arising from the same facts may be litigated at the same time; the pendency of a derivative action does not bar stockholders from bringing a direct action or prevent certification of a stockholder class.
- The Court of Chancery acted within its discretion in awarding class counsel $10,627,587 in fees and expenses because counsel achieved a benefit exceeding $100 million, obtained a substantial therapeutic benefit, devoted 5,804 hours to the litigation, and satisfied the applicable fee-award factors.
Questions Presented
- Whether stockholders may pursue a direct class action when a derivative action concerning the same alleged wrongs is also pending.
- Whether the Court of Chancery abused its discretion in awarding class counsel $10,627,587 in attorneys' fees and expenses.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- Gentile v. Rossette, 906 A.2d 91 (Del. 2006)(followed)
- Gatz v. Ponsoldt, 925 A.2d 1265 (Del. 2007)(followed)
- Sugarland Industries, Inc. v. Thomas, 420 A.2d 142, 149 (Del. 1980)(applied)
- In re Loral Space and Communications Inc. Consol. Litig., 2008 WL 4293781 (Del. Ch.)(relied upon)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…