Century Indemnity Co. v. Viking Pump, Inc.

Century Indemnity · Supreme Court of Delaware · August 15, 2014 · No. No. 371, 2014; C.A. No. N10C-06-141; C.A. No. 1465

Summary

The Delaware Supreme Court dismissed an appeal and cross-appeals as premature because a timely motion under Superior Court Civil Rule 59 remained pending in the trial court. The Court held that such a motion tolls the time for appealing an otherwise final judgment and waived the filing fee for any future appeal from the Superior Court's final judgment.

Holdings

  1. A timely filed motion for reargument or to amend a judgment tolls the time for taking an appeal from an otherwise final judgment; an appeal filed while that motion remains pending is premature.
  2. The appeal and cross-appeals must be dismissed because they were filed before the Superior Court entered a final judgment resolving the pending Rule 59 motion.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the appeal was timely and properly before the Supreme Court when a Rule 59 motion to reargue or amend the judgment remained pending.
  2. Whether the appeal and cross-appeals should be dismissed as premature rather than treated as appeals from an interlocutory judgment.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (1)

  • Tomasetti v. Wilmington Savings Fund Soc'y, 672 A.2d 61, 64 (Del. 1996)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…