Summary
The Delaware Supreme Court refused to accept an interlocutory appeal from the Superior Court’s denial of Hitachi Koki Co., Ltd.’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Court held that the application did not satisfy the strict certification standards under Delaware Supreme Court Rule 42 and that the potential benefits of interlocutory review did not outweigh its probable costs and disruption.
Holdings
- Interlocutory review was not warranted because the application did not satisfy Delaware Supreme Court Rule 42(b)'s strict standards for certification and the potential benefits of review did not outweigh the inefficiency, disruption, and probable costs of an interlocutory appeal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Delaware Supreme Court should accept an interlocutory appeal from the Superior Court's order denying HKK's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
- Whether the application satisfied the strict certification and exceptional-circumstances requirements for interlocutory review under Delaware Supreme Court Rule 42(b).
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (7)
- Cardona v. Hitachi Koki Co., Ltd., 2019 WL 449698 (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 5, 2019)(applied)
- Boone v. Oy Partek Ab, 724 A.2d 1150 (Del. Super. Ct. 1997)(applied_by_lower_court)
- LaNuova D & B, S.p.A. v. Bowe Co., 513 A.2d 764 (Del. 1986)(applied_by_lower_court)
- Tortuga Cas. Co. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 1991 WL 247813 (Del. Nov. 14, 1991)(followed)
- Curran Composites, Inc. v. Total Holdings USA, Inc., 2009 WL 4170395 (Del. Nov. 25, 2009)(followed)
- Olivieri v. Aveta, Inc., 2008 WL 4216352 (Del. Sept. 16, 2008)(followed)
- Jelin v. NRG Barriers, Inc., 1996 WL 442907 (Del. July 23, 1996)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…