Estate of Kisha A. Reilly v. Dave Turko

No. 63, 2022 · Supreme Court of the State of Delaware · April 21, 2022 · No. No. 63, 2022

Summary

The Delaware Supreme Court dismissed an appeal arising from the dismissal of claims concerning the drug-overdose death of Kisha A. Reilly. The Court held that Shaun Reilly, who was omitted from the amended complaint, was a nonparty without standing to appeal and lacked authority to represent the estate because he was not an attorney. The Court also held that a power of attorney could not authorize a nonlawyer nonparty to bring an appeal on behalf of the estate.

Holdings

  1. A person who is not a party to the operative amended complaint lacks standing to bring a direct appeal.
  2. A nonparty who is not an attorney may not prosecute an appeal on behalf of an estate under a power of attorney.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Shaun S. Reilly, who was not a party to the amended complaint, had standing to appeal the Superior Court's dismissal.
  2. Whether a nonlawyer nonparty could prosecute an appeal on behalf of the estate under a power of attorney.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (4)

  • McCaffrey v. City of Wilmington, 133 A.3d 536, 544 (Del. 2016)(followed)
  • Townsend v. Griffith, 570 A.2d 1157, 1158 (Del. 1990)(followed)
  • Townsend v. Integrated Mfg. & Assembly, 2013 WL 5537379, at *2 (Del. Oct. 7, 2013)(followed)
  • Griffith, 570 A.2d 1157, 1158 (Del. 1990)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…