Summary
The Delaware Supreme Court dismissed Isaias R. Ortiz’s petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to require the Superior Court to decide his motion to correct an illegal sentence without awaiting additional information about a prior New York conviction. The Court held that the Superior Court acted within its discretion in granting the State additional time and that Ortiz failed to establish the requirements for mandamus relief.
Holdings
- Mandamus was unavailable because Ortiz did not establish a clear right to immediate performance, the absence of another adequate remedy, or an arbitrary failure or refusal by the Superior Court to act.
Questions Presented
- Whether Ortiz was entitled to a writ of mandamus directing the Superior Court to decide his motion to correct an illegal sentence before the State submitted additional records concerning his prior New York conviction.
- Whether the Superior Court's grants of additional time to the State constituted an arbitrary failure or refusal to perform a judicial duty.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (6)
- Ortiz v. State, 2004 WL 2741185 (Del. Nov. 16, 2004)(followed as prior procedural history)
- Ortiz v. State, 2021 WL 1310668 (Del. Apr. 7, 2021)(followed as prior procedural history)
- Ortiz v. State, 2015 WL 4066011 (Del. June 30, 2015)(followed as prior procedural history)
- Ortiz v. State, 2012 WL 4377782 (Del. Sept. 25, 2012)(followed as prior procedural history)
- Ortiz v. State, 2007 WL 188173 (Del. Jan. 25, 2007)(followed as prior procedural history)
- In re Bordley, 545 A.2d 619, 620 (Del. 1988)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…