Summary
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals held that Debra McPherson had a right to intervene in the District of Columbia Housing Authority's action for possession of a public housing unit. The court concluded that her continued occupancy and recertification established a protectable interest that could be impaired by eviction, and that no existing party adequately represented that interest. The court reversed and remanded with instructions to grant intervention.
Holdings
- A continuing occupant of public housing who alleges an interest arising from her occupancy and repeated recertifications has a protectable interest in the possession action, even though her interest is not equivalent to that of the deceased contractual tenant.
- The applicant satisfied the impairment and inadequate-representation requirements for intervention as of right.
- The trial court's denial was improper because the record contained no factual findings or conclusions of law sufficient to support denial, and Debra McPherson was entitled to intervene as a matter of right.
Questions Presented
- Whether Debra McPherson was entitled to intervene as of right under Super. Ct. Civ. R. 24(a) in the Housing Authority's possession action against her deceased mother.
- Whether the trial court erred by denying intervention after conducting a non-evidentiary hearing without making factual findings or conclusions of law.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (9)
- Vale Properties, Ltd. v. Canterbury Tales, Inc., 431 A.2d 11, 14 (D.C. 1981)(followed)
- Calvin-Humphrey v. District of Columbia, 340 A.2d 795, 798-99 (D.C. 1975)(followed)
- Mova Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Shalala, 329 U.S. App. D.C. 341, 140 F.3d 1060, 1074 (1998)(followed)
- Hodgson v. United Mine Workers of America, 153 U.S. App. D.C. 407, 414 n. 36, 473 F.2d 118, 125 n. 36 (1972)(followed)
- Johnson v. United States, 398 A.2d 354, 362 (D.C. 1979)(followed)
- Nuesse v. Camp, 128 U.S. App. D.C. 172, 178, 385 F.2d 694, 700 (1967)(followed)
- Smuck v. Hobson, 132 U.S. App. D.C. 372, 376, 408 F.2d 175, 179 (1969)(followed)
- Robinson v. First National Bank of Chicago, 765 A.2d 543, 544 (D.C. 2001)(followed)
- Mokhiber v. Davis, 537 A.2d 1100, 1114 (D.C. 1988)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…