Thomas v. Disabled American Veterans Ass'n

930 A.2d 997 (D.C. 2007) · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · August 23, 2007

Summary

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals reviewed the dismissal of claims against the Disabled American Veterans Association and the Non-Commissioned Officers Association arising from their alleged failure to represent the plaintiff in proceedings before the Department of Veterans Affairs. The court held that the Superior Court should have stayed, rather than dismissed, the claims against DAV while related federal litigation was pending. It also held that dismissal of the claims against NCOA for lack of personal jurisdiction was premature because unresolved factual questions remained concerning NCOA's District of Columbia contacts and the government-contacts exception.

Holdings

  1. A Superior Court action should not be dismissed merely because a similar action is pending in federal court. When appropriate, the court may stay its proceedings pending final determination of the federal action.
  2. The Superior Court acted prematurely in dismissing Thomas's claims against NCOA for lack of personal jurisdiction because the record presented unresolved factual questions concerning NCOA's activities in the District of Columbia and whether those activities fell within the government-contacts exception or the agency-related exception recognized in Lex Tex.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Superior Court could dismiss Thomas's complaint against DAV solely because a substantially similar action was pending in federal court.
  2. Whether the Superior Court prematurely dismissed Thomas's claims against NCOA for lack of personal jurisdiction without resolving factual disputes concerning NCOA's District of Columbia contacts and the applicability of the government-contacts exception.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (15)

  • Jones v. John W. Glen, Inc., 130 U.S.App. D.C. 153, 397 F.2d 714 (1968)(not supportive)
  • Smith v. Leigh, 101 U.S.App. D.C. 225, 248 F.2d 85 (1957)(followed)
  • Coates v. Ellis, 61 A.2d 28 (D.C. 1948)(followed)
  • Batter v. Dixon, 177 A.2d 893 (D.C. 1962)(followed)
  • Bradley v. Triplex Shoe Co., 66 A.2d 208 (D.C. 1949)(followed)
  • Environmental Research International, Inc. v. Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc., 355 A.2d 808 (D.C. 1976) (en banc)(distinguished)
  • Mueller Brass Co. v. Alexander Milburn Co., 80 U.S.App. D.C. 274, 152 F.2d 142 (1945)(followed)
  • Lex Tex Ltd., Inc. v. Skillman, 579 A.2d 244 (D.C. 1990)(followed)
  • Edmond v. United States Postal Service General Counsel, 292 U.S.App. D.C. 240, 949 F.2d 415 (1991)(followed)
  • Mwani v. bin Laden, 368 U.S.App. D.C. 1, 417 F.3d 1 (2005)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 15.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…