In re K.S., J.S., Appellant

In re K.S., 966 A.2d 871 (D.C. 2009) · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · March 5, 2009 · No. 04-FS-1597

Summary

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals affirmed a Superior Court finding that K.S. was a neglected child based on physical abuse, threats, invasive examinations, and resulting mental and emotional harm. The court also upheld the trial court's decision to allow K.S. to testify by closed-circuit television outside her mother's physical presence, concluding that the procedure was supported by individualized expert evidence of trauma and was consistent with due process.

Holdings

  1. A trial court may permit a child in a neglect proceeding to testify outside the parent's physical presence by closed-circuit television, with an opportunity for real-time cross-examination, when the court has a firm, individualized evidentiary basis for finding serious harm from testimony in the parent's presence and balances the child's welfare against the parent's need for the testimony.
  2. The evidence sufficiently supported the finding that K.S. was a neglected child because J.S.'s vaginal examinations, beatings, and threats caused mental and emotional injury and demonstrated a failure to provide proper parental care, even absent proof of serious physical injury or malicious intent.
  3. The trial court properly could rely on the psychologist's expert opinion even though it was based in part on K.S.'s self-reported experiences and symptoms.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Superior Court permissibly allowed K.S. to testify outside J.S.'s physical presence by closed-circuit television while preserving real-time cross-examination.
  2. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the finding that K.S. was a neglected child under D.C. Code § 16-2301(9)(A)(i) and (ii).
  3. Whether the trial court improperly relied on expert testimony based in part on K.S.'s self-reported history.
  4. Whether the trial court's findings were internally inconsistent regarding J.S.'s explanation for the gonorrhea-related beating.
  5. Whether the trial court improperly restricted J.S.'s testimony concerning K.S.'s desire to remain with her aunt.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (15)

  • In re Jam J., 825 A.2d 902 (D.C. 2003)(followed)
  • Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990)(followed)
  • Hicks-Bey v. United States, 649 A.2d 569 (D.C. 1994)(followed)
  • Ahmed v. United States, 856 A.2d 560 (D.C. 2004)(followed)
  • Coy v. Iowa, 487 U.S. 1012 (1988)(considered)
  • Williams v. United States, 859 A.2d 130 (D.C. 2004)(followed)
  • In re Melton, 597 A.2d 892 (D.C. 1991)(followed)
  • District of Columbia v. Anderson, 597 A.2d 1295 (D.C. 1991)(followed)
  • In re N.P., 882 A.2d 241 (D.C. 2005)(followed)
  • In re A.H., 842 A.2d 674 (D.C. 2004)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 15.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…