Turquoise Wylie v. Glenncrest

143 A.3d 73 (D.C. 2016) · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · July 21, 2016 · No. 15-CV-146

Summary

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a judgment for possession entered by default against a tenant in a landlord-tenant nonpayment-of-rent case. The court held that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the tenant’s Rule 60(b) motion because it failed to take evidence or testimony despite disputed factual issues and improperly favored maintaining the default over resolving the matter on its merits. The remand directed full consideration of relief under Rule 60(b)(1) and (6), along with issues potentially supporting relief under Rule 60(b)(4).

Holdings

  1. The Superior Court abused its discretion by denying Wylie's Rule 60(b) motion without taking testimony or admitting documents, despite material factual disputes requiring credibility determinations.
  2. In evaluating relief under Rule 60(b)(1) or Rule 60(b)(6), the court must meaningfully consider actual notice and willfulness, good faith, promptness, a prima facie meritorious defense, and prejudice to the opposing party, while giving substantial weight to the preference for resolving cases on the merits.
  3. On remand, the Superior Court must consider whether ineffective service, failure to provide required notice of the ex parte proof hearing, or an invalid waiver of notice to quit could support relief from a void judgment under Rule 60(b)(4).

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Superior Court abused its discretion in denying Wylie's Rule 60(b)(1) and Rule 60(b)(6) motion without conducting an adequate inquiry into disputed facts and the factors governing relief from a default judgment.
  2. Whether an evidentiary hearing was required where the parties disputed material facts concerning notice, Wylie's reasons for failing to appear, her good faith, and the existence of a meritorious defense.
  3. Whether issues concerning ineffective service, lack of notice of the ex parte proof hearing, or an allegedly invalid waiver of notice to quit might support relief under Rule 60(b)(4).

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (21)

  • Hawkings v. Lynnhill Condominium Unit Owners Ass’n, 513 A.2d 242, 244 n.2 (D.C. 1986)(followed)
  • Lipscomb v. The Raddatz Law Firm, 109 F. Supp. 3d 251, 255 (D.D.C. 2015)(considered)
  • Falconi-Sachs v. LPF Senate Square, LLC, No. 14-CV-433, 2016 WL 3654466, at *4-5 (D.C. July 8, 2016)(considered)
  • Trans-Lux Radio City Corp. v. Serv. Parking Corp., 54 A.2d 144, 146 (D.C. 1947)(followed)
  • Jones v. Hersh, 845 A.2d 541, 544-47 (D.C. 2004)(followed)
  • Carrasco v. Thomas D. Walsh, Inc., 988 A.2d 471, 474-76 (D.C. 2010)(followed)
  • Starling v. Jephunneh Lawrence & Assocs., 495 A.2d 1157, 1159-62 (D.C. 1985)(followed)
  • Dunn v. Profitt, 408 A.2d 991, 993 & n.3 (D.C. 1979) (per curiam)(followed)
  • Westmoreland v. Weaver Bros., Inc., 295 A.2d 506, 508 (D.C. 1972)(followed)
  • Italia Societa Anonima Di Navigazione v. Cavalieri, 99 A.2d 488, 489 (D.C. 1953)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 21.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…