Summary
In Katke v. Bersche, the Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal granted a writ of prohibition, holding that a voluntary dismissal of a petition to determine incapacity, once accepted by the trial court, divests the court of jurisdiction over the entire case. Because the original petitioner withdrew her petition and the court found all related motions moot, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to allow a subsequent petition filed under the same case number. The court reaffirmed that a plaintiff's right to voluntarily dismiss is almost absolute, and prohibition lies when a lower court exceeds its jurisdiction after such dismissal.
Holdings
- A voluntary dismissal of the original petition, accepted by the trial court, deprives the court of jurisdiction over the subject matter of the dismissed claim; thus a subsequent petition filed under the same case number is a nullity.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction by allowing a subsequent petition to determine incapacity to proceed under the same case number after the original petition was voluntarily withdrawn.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (4)
- Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Garfinkel, 25 So. 3d 62 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)(cited)
- Tobkin v. State, 777 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(cited)
- English v. McCrary, 348 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 1977)(cited)
- Cutler v. Cutler, 84 So. 3d 1172 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.