Summary
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a circuit court judgment awarding workers' compensation to Eston Strickland, a fire-tower watchman who was injured in a gunfight with another forestry worker. The court held that a later decision changing the procedure for reviewing deputy commissioners' orders applied prospectively because Strickland had relied in good faith on the prior judicially approved procedure. On the merits, the court concluded that the appellants had not shown that the circuit court's finding in Strickland's favor was unsupported by the record.
Holdings
- As applied to Strickland's case, Tigertail Quarries, Inc. v. Ward operated prospectively only. A claimant who proceeded in reliance on the then-prevailing judicial construction of the workers' compensation statutes could not have that procedure and potentially valuable compensation right defeated by a later overruling decision.
- The employer and carrier failed to show that the circuit court reached an erroneous conclusion unsupported by the record; the circuit court judgment reversing the deputy commissioner was affirmed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the circuit court had authority to review the deputy commissioner's order directly despite the intervening decision in Tigertail Quarries, Inc. v. Ward.
- Whether Tigertail Quarries, Inc. v. Ward should operate prospectively rather than retrospectively where the claimant relied on the prior judicially approved appellate procedure.
- Whether the employer and carrier demonstrated that the circuit court's reversal of the deputy commissioner's denial of compensation was unsupported by the record.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (14)
- Tigertail Quarries, Inc. v. Ward, 154 Fla. 122, 16 So. 2d 812(followed as to its overruling effect but limited to prospective operation in this case)
- Johnson v. Midland Constructors, Inc., 150 Fla. 353, 7 So. 2d 449(overruled by Tigertail)
- Walker v. Telfair Stockton Co., 152 Fla. 434, 12 So. 2d 177(followed or relied upon)
- State ex rel. Midwest Pipe Supply Co. v. Haid, 330 Mo. 1093, 52 S.W. 2d 183(persuasive authority)
- Gelpcke v. City of Dubuque, 1 Wall. 175(persuasive authority)
- Douglas v. County of Pike, 101 U.S. 677, 687(persuasive authority)
- Mountain Grove Bank v. Douglas County, 146 Mo. 42, 47 S.W. 944(persuasive authority)
- Culpepper v. Culpepper, 147 Fla. 632, 3 So. 2d 330(followed by analogy)
- South Atlantic S.S. Co. v. Tutson, 139 Fla. 405, 190 So. 675(followed by analogy)
- Chamberlain v. Florida Power Corporation, 144 Fla. 719, 198 So. 486(followed)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…