Summary
The Supreme Court of Florida reviewed whether claimants should receive extensions to file suit on claims against an estate after receiving objections from a court-appointed curator. The court held that, under the extraordinary circumstances presented, denying the requested one- or two-day extensions was unreasonable and arbitrary, and it reversed and remanded. The court did not decide the constitutional challenge concerning the application of an insurance-related probate statute.
Holdings
- The time limitations in section 733.18 for filing objections to estate claims and filing an action or suit on a contested claim are rules of judicial procedure rather than statutes of nonclaim, and they may be relaxed by the probate judge in the exercise of reasonable discretion for good cause.
- The claimants established good cause for extending the filing period because the curator's authority was not disclosed in the objections, the claimants' attorney had repeatedly been told that no administrator had been appointed, and the suits were filed only one or two days late. Under these extraordinary circumstances, refusing the requested extension was clearly unreasonable and arbitrary.
Questions Presented
- Whether the statutory time limits for filing objections to estate claims and filing suit on contested claims are procedural rules that may be relaxed by the probate judge for good cause.
- Whether the circumstances—including the claimants' reasonable reliance on information from the probate judge's office, the curator's limited role, the lack of notice of the curator's authority, and the minimal delay—constituted good cause for extending the time to file suit.
- Whether applying the insurance exception in section 733.16(1)(d), Florida Statutes (1967), to claims arising under a preexisting insurance contract impaired the obligation of contract under the Florida and federal Constitutions.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (11)
- Mayo v. Market Fruit Co. of Sanford, 40 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 1949)(followed)
- In re Jeffries' Estate, 181 So. 833 (Fla. 1938)(followed)
- In re Goldman's Estate, 79 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 1955)(followed)
- Smoak v. Graham, 167 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 1964)(followed)
- Sessions v. Jelks, 194 So. 2d 307 (Fla. App. 1st Dist. 1967)(followed)
- In re Estate of Norregaard, 220 So. 2d 653 (Fla. App. 3d Dist. 1969)(followed)
- In re Kamp's Estate, 177 So. 2d 757 (Fla. App. 1st Dist. 1965)(followed)
- In re Meigs' Estate, 177 So. 2d 246 (Fla. App. 1st Dist. 1965)(followed)
- In re Goldman's Estate, 79 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 1955)(distinguished)
- Ellard v. Godwin, 77 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 1955)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…