Summary
The Supreme Court of Florida quashed the district court’s decision affirming judgment on the pleadings for Florida Power & Light Company in a negligence action arising from an inoperative streetlight and a child’s death. The court remanded for proceedings consistent with Clay Electric, including consideration of whether the utility assumed a specific legally recognized duty to maintain the streetlight with due care.
Holdings
- The Supreme Court of Florida quashed the district court's decision and remanded for proceedings consistent with Clay Electric, which recognized that a utility may assume a specific, legally recognized duty to act with due care in maintaining streetlights.
- On remand, review is de novo, and the court must treat all well-pleaded material allegations and fair inferences from the complaint as true and determine whether the complaint states a cause of action.
Questions Presented
- Whether the circuit court properly granted Florida Power & Light Company's motion for judgment on the pleadings in the negligence action.
- Whether the district court's affirmance should be quashed in light of the Supreme Court of Florida's contemporaneous decision in Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Johnson concerning a utility's potentially assumed duty to maintain streetlights.
- What standard governs review of the judgment on the pleadings on remand.
Disposition
quashed
Cases Cited (6)
- Martinez v. Florida Power & Light Co., 785 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(reversed_or_quashed)
- Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Johnson, Nos. SC01-1955 & SC01-1956, 2003 WL 22966277 (Fla. Dec. 18, 2003)(followed)
- Johnson v. Lance, Inc., 790 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)(approved)
- Lance, Inc. v. Johnson, 790 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)(approved)
- Reinhard v. Bliss, 85 So. 2d 131, 133 (Fla. 1956)(followed)
- Armstrong v. Harris, 773 So. 2d 7, 11 (Fla. 2000)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…