Summary
The Supreme Court of Florida considered whether chapter 99-188, the Three-Strike Violent Felony Offender Act, violated the Florida Constitution’s single-subject clause. The court held that the Act did not violate article III, section 6, and upheld Franklin’s habitual-felony-offender sentence. The opinion clarified how courts should identify an act’s single subject and determine whether its provisions are properly connected to that subject.
Holdings
- A person adversely affected by sentencing amendments contained in a chapter law has standing to challenge the law under article III, section 6, even if the person was not directly affected by every challenged provision.
- The single subject of a legislative act ordinarily is determined from the short title, specifically the language following the customary phrase "an act relating to" and preceding the indexing of the act's provisions.
- A connection between a provision and an act's subject is proper if it is natural or logical, or if there is a reasonable explanation showing that the provision is necessary to the subject or tends to make effective or promote the legislation's objects and purposes.
- Sections 11 and 13 were properly connected to the Act's single subject of sentencing and therefore did not violate article III, section 6.
- Chapter 99-188, Laws of Florida, does not violate the single subject clause of article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.
Questions Presented
- Whether Franklin had standing to challenge chapter 99-188 under the single subject clause even though he was not directly affected by sections 11 and 13.
- How courts should identify the single subject of a legislative act under article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.
- What test governs whether provisions of an act are matters properly connected with its single subject.
- Whether sections 11 and 13 of chapter 99-188 were properly connected to the Act's subject of sentencing.
- Whether chapter 99-188 violated article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.
Disposition
approved
Cases Cited (29)
- Taylor v. State, 818 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)(disapproved)
- State v. Franklin, 836 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)(approved)
- Hernandez-Molina v. State, 860 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)(approved)
- State v. Thompson, 750 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 1999)(followed)
- State ex rel. Flink v. Canova, 94 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 1957)(followed)
- Colonial Investment Co. v. Nolan, 131 So. 178 (Fla. 1930)(followed)
- State ex rel. Moodie v. Bryan, 39 So. 929 (Fla. 1905)(followed)
- Sebring Airport Authority v. McIntyre, 783 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 2001)(followed)
- State ex rel. Bisbee v. Drew, 17 Fla. 67 (1879)(followed)
- Amos v. Mathews, 126 So. 308 (Fla. 1930)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 29.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…